top of page

Facilitating Seamless Research Collaboration - Important Features of Commercial RDM Services

  • Writer: myLaminin
    myLaminin
  • May 5
  • 4 min read

Today’s research is increasingly multi-disciplinary and cross-jurisdictional. The increasing complexity of projects that span institutions, time zones, and multiple disciplines requires dependable and secure digital collaboration tools. Research teams conducting multi-site clinical trials or global climate modeling projects and cross-disciplinary humanities initiatives require more than file storage. They need adaptable intelligent tools which make data management intuitive while ensuring seamless collaboration. New and changing regulatory standards are creating a demand for commercial Research Data Management (RDM) Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) platforms. Their ability to address these regulatory requirements  has led to their adoption among researchers that prefer to focus on breakthroughs and not bureaucracy. 


Real-time collaboration tools together with robust, and secure file sharing capabilities with version control functionality and role-based access controls has made commercial RDM platforms like myLaminin extremely attractive to researchers that want to easily address institutional ethics board and regulatory requirements. Many data storage platforms implement shared workspaces with permission settings and version histories yet their practical execution differs significantly and lack the research operational control layer. This would include robust team management, data collection capabilities, agreement management, research data repository management, research ethics board support, and audit trail features. Research collaboration brings together participants with diverse technical skills and roles on the project. This requires an ability to set different permissions levels to address data access, and ethical restrictions for restricted data handling. The failure of a system to accommodate these nuances creates administrative delays in collaboration while producing data ownership confusion and potential regulatory non-compliance issues and cybersecurity vulnerabilities.


Research coordination requires shared workspaces which enable team members to place files into central locations, and organized folders for data management. Such collaboration spaces must integrate both immediate and delayed interaction possibilities because researchers need to access data in real time or work independently based on their schedule and/or time zone. The addition of commenting tags and discussions through integrated features enhances data transparency because they enable researchers to add annotations to datasets and document decisions along with issue flags. Many commercial platforms maintain a separate system for data storage which forces teams to conduct their discussions using either email or external communication applications which may be less secure or require data encryption through this transmission. The lack of integration between communication tools and data storage systems creates conditions for miscommunication to occur and makes it difficult to track decision rationale when research requires documentation for publication or auditing purposes.


A successful collaboration requires version control as an essential component. The evolution of complex research projects requires continuous dataset and document updates with many contributors making simultaneous file modifications. Version control becomes essential because teams face the danger of data overwriting alongside duplicated work and lost modifications when they lack proper version control systems. A properly designed RDM platform must include automatic versioning capabilities together with version restoration and version comparison functions as well as complete edit history display. Research reproducibility becomes more achievable through enhanced workflow transparency which represents a fundamental requirement in contemporary data-intensive research practices.


Organizations need detailed access control systems to achieve effective teamwork. Research team members should have different data access privileges based on team member roles and responsibilities on the project particularly when dealing with sensitive data, proprietary materials, and phased project deliverables. The use of binary permission levels such as read/write creates administrative problems and increases security vulnerabilities. Institutions should select platforms which support role-based access controls and dynamic permission adjustments with custom user group creation during project development. The implemented features protect data integrity yet enable trusted collaborators to access information freely. More importantly, it should support the different roles of research legal services, research ethics board administrators and reviewers, research legal services, and research librarians.


myLaminin addresses these advanced data governance and collaboration requirements for secure multi-researcher collaboration contexts. The blockchain-powered architecture of myLaminin allows decentralized research activities to operate with complete synchronization supporting distributed science (DeSi). The platform's collaborative workspaces allow real-time distributed work through organized project spaces which gives researchers complete control over the research data repository with data upload, download, rename, move, copy, and delete capabilities with precise records management according to access permissions. The system's key differentiator is its audit trail feature which logs all user actions irreversibly so that all actions remain visible and linked to their author. 


The need to track version changes becomes essential for projects that span multiple institutions and different sectors because it ensures data integrity and consistency. Organizational policies and ethical requirements guide institutions to create user roles for principal investigators, graduate students, external reviewers, and funding agencies. myLaminin supports institutional protocols and standard operating processes already in place by allowing the configuration of institutional forms supporting these processes as well as supporting long-term data stewardship through alerts to PIs and research librarians when it’s time to archive research data. These features provide assurance regarding the data integrity and secure communication of that data to facilitate collaborative research initiatives.


The success of research collaboration depends on both the willingness to share data and the tools that enable researchers to do so securely. Higher educational institutions should assess RDM SaaS platforms for their collaboration features rather than mere storage capacity and pricing - especially when their research teams are cross-jurisdictional and inter-disciplinary. Platforms must provide thoughtful workflows together with clear data histories and flexible access mechanisms which facilitate standards compliance. These measures enable productive and trustworthy collaboration which also promotes equitable research practices.

Comments


Image by Andrew Neel
bottom of page